How to Discern what's Accurate in Nutrition: Understanding the Hierarchy of Scientific Evidence
 Inspired by a talk from Adam Sud at the PLANTSTRONG Retreat
In a world overflowing with nutrition advice—from viral TikToks and bestselling books to well-meaning friends and flashy health blogs—it’s never been harder to separate fact from fiction. Everyone seems to have an opinion, but not all opinions are grounded in evidence.
So how do we know what to trust?
At our most recent PLANTSTRONG Retreat, Adam Sud offered a powerful answer: you must understand the hierarchy of scientific evidence.
Not All Evidence is Created Equal
Science is a tool to help us get closer to what is accurate—but not all studies or sources carry the same weight. There’s a clear structure to how different types of evidence rank when it comes to reliability, reproducibility, and real-world applicability.
This structure is known as the Hierarchy of Scientific Evidence, and it helps us evaluate claims about health, nutrition, and disease prevention.
Here’s how it breaks down, from strongest to weakest:
Â
🟢 1. Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews
These sit at the very top. A meta-analysis gathers data from multiple high-quality studies on the same topic and analyzes them together for a more powerful conclusion. A systematic review evaluates all available evidence using a rigorous, predefined method. These are the gold standard.
🟡 2. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
RCTs divide people into groups randomly to test an intervention (like a specific diet) against a control. Because of their structure, they’re great for identifying cause and effect.
đźź 3. Cohort Studies
These follow large groups of people over time to observe how different factors (like diet, lifestyle, or environment) affect outcomes. They're useful for spotting patterns and associations.
đźź 4. Case-Control Studies
These look backward—comparing people with a certain condition to those without, to identify possible contributing factors.
đź”´ 5. Cross-Sectional Studies
These are "snapshot" studies, analyzing data from a population at one point in time. They can show correlation, but not cause.
đź”´ 6. Animal and In Vitro Studies
These are often necessary early steps in research but rarely translate to human outcomes. What works in a mouse—or a petri dish—might not work in you.
đź”´ 7. Case Reports, Opinion Pieces, and Anecdotes
These are the weakest forms of evidence. Personal stories and expert opinions may be compelling, but they don’t prove anything without data to back them up. Remember, “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence” - Hitchen’s Razor
Â
Why This Matters
When it comes to your health, decisions should be based on more than just popularity or personal testimony. The hierarchy of evidence helps us avoid being misled by cherry-picked data or emotionally persuasive (but scientifically weak) claims.
At PLANTSTRONG, we’re committed to being a science-backed resource. That’s why our food line, corporate wellness program, and educational content are rooted in the strongest available evidence—like the numerous randomized trials and cohort studies that support the power of a whole food, plant-based lifestyle to prevent and even reverse chronic disease.
It’s not about being dogmatic. It’s about making informed, empowered choices—armed with the best evidence we have.
Â
Final Thought
As Adam Sud reminded us: “If we don’t understand the strength of the evidence behind a claim, we risk being pulled in a hundred different directions—none of which may be rooted in accuracy.”
So the next time you hear a bold nutrition claim, ask:
Where does this fall on the hierarchy?
Your health—and your clarity—may depend on it.
Â
